🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about that comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if the American defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite delivery and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the interesting rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his potential.

The American has made a several significant, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and forced him to use far too much energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {